No state in recent years has been more aggressive than Utah, home to some of the nation’s most magnificent landscapes, in trying to seize control of land owned by the federal government.

In the “sagebrush rebellion” of the late 1970s to the early 1980s, challenges by Utah and other Western states to the federal government’s ownership of vast swaths of land within their borders got no traction in Congress or the courts. More recently, claims of federal land grabs and colonialism have been mostly pushed by extremists, like those who seized control of a National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon for a few weeks in 2016.

Now, with the U.S. Supreme Court firmly in the hands of a conservative majority, Utah’s leaders are making a Hail Mary move. The state is asking the court to bypass the lower federal courts, something it rarely does, to hear its argument that the federal government is required by the Constitution to transfer about half of the 37.4 million acres it owns in Utah to the state.

Among national universities, Princeton was ranked No. 1 again, followed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard. Stanford,9x999 slots which tied for third last year, fell to No. 4. U.S. News again judged Williams College the best among national liberal arts colleges. Spelman College was declared the country’s top historically Black institution.

The court is expected to decide whether to take up the matter in mid-January. Should it agree to consider the case and side with Utah, tens of millions of acres of land across the West now owned by all Americans could be opened to largely unregulated exploitation of its mineral, fossil fuel, timber and grazing resources.

Utah and other states supporting its lawsuit see these lands, which the federal government reserved for all Americans when the states entered the union, as potential sources of tax revenue and development opportunities, and have long complained about the lack of local control over lands held by Washington.

Many of those resources are already being used or extracted under the federal government’s policies of allowing for multiple uses of the land while maintaining sustained yields of their renewable resources. But those lands also contain some of the nation’s most culturally, historically and environmentally significant treasures, which the federal government also is responsible for protecting. Utah’s lawsuit is nothing less than a frontal assault on the long tradition of safeguarding these landscapes in trust for all Americans.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.branco